Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ager et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv00028
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John Ager, Jerry Antoine, Elizabeth Arflin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Robinson v. Ed Robinson Laundry and Dry Cleaning Inc
as 3:2015cv02882
Plaintiff:
James Robinson
Defendant:
Ed Robinson Laundry and Dry Cleaning Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Robinson v. Fryar et al
as 3:2012cv03505
Plaintiff:
James Robinson
Defendant:
Karen Fryar, Vanessa Cooper, Warren Giese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Corbitt v. Branton et al
as 1:2012cv02967
Plaintiff:
Nolan Corbitt
Defendant:
Alice Branton, Mahendra Kumar Trivedi, Rhonda Cash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Cannon et al
as 4:2012cv00155
Petitioner:
James Robinson
Respondent:
Al Cannon, Mitch Lucas and Scarlet Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Doe v. Kershaw County et al
as 1:2011cv02419
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Kershaw County , Southeastern Service Group Inc, Susan Mears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Kershaw County et al
as 5:2011cv02419
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Kershaw County , Hudson Murray , Ada Blackmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Atlantic Group Inc, The
as 8:2009cv02942
Plaintiff:
Charles Adams, Roger Byers, Scott Clary and others
Defendant:
Atlantic Group Inc, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Robinson v. McKie
as 0:2009cv01757
Petitioner:
James Robinson
Respondent:
Bernard McKie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. McKie
as 1:2009cv01757
Petitioner:
James Robinson
Respondent:
Bernard McKie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
