Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Stidwell v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv16672
Plaintiff:
Devon Stidwell
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Terry Hake, Shawn McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv07782
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
James Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
USA v. James Harris
as 23-2421
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES HARRIS, also known as Tyrell
James Rand v. Rebecca R. Pallmeyer
as 23-2128
Petitioner:
JAMES HARRY RAND
Respondent:
REBECCA R. PALLMEYER
James Rand v. Rebecca Pallmeyer
as 23-1377
Petitioner:
JAMES HARRY RAND
Respondent:
REBECCA R. PALLMEYER
The Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv07098
Plaintiff:
The Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama d/b/a the University of Alabama and The Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama doing business as the University of Alabama
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, A39ZTG1WWTNMTO, AQRWXN0W5PLE7 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
HARRIS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv00895
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
JAMES HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pitts et al v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2016cv11498
Plaintiff:
Herbert Pitts, Nathaniel Boyce, Coreyon Williamson and others
Defendant:
Cook County Jail and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Dart
as 1:2016cv08776
Plaintiff:
James Harris
Defendant:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
