Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Harris v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
James Harris
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Harris v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02234
Plaintiff:
James Harris
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Harris v. Cole et al
as 1:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
James Harris
Defendant:
Johnny Jerry Cole, Direct Trucking Corporation doing business as Sparc Transport and Progressive Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02353
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Bordages v. United States Justice Dept. et al
as 2:2015cv02708
Plaintiff:
James Harry Hebert Bordages, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Justice Dept., United States Dept. of Homeland Security, United States Marshal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. George
as 1:2013cv00136
Plaintiff:
James Harris
Defendant:
Enoch George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pennington v. Terry et al
as 2:2013cv00017
Plaintiff:
Scottie Dales Pennington
Defendant:
Bob Terry, David Dukes, Ken Sircy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bordages v. Armstrong et al
as 2:2013cv02042
Plaintiff:
James Harry Hebert Bordages, Jr.
Defendant:
Armstrong, Bill Oldham, Mia Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bordages v. Oldham et al
as 2:2012cv03062
Petitioner:
James Harry Bordages, Jr.
Respondent:
Bill Oldham and Shelby County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bordages v. Sports Clips Incorporated
as 2:2012cv02060
Plaintiff:
James Harry Hebert Bordages, Jr.
Defendant:
Sports Clips Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
