Cases 1 - 10 of 6,134
James Burke v. Commissioner Social Security
as 23-2352
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY
BURKE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2020cv14607
Plaintiff:
JAMES E BURKE
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Burke v. Saylor et al
as 4:2020cv01271
Defendant:
Charles H. Saylor, Ed Greco, Esther Rhodes and others
Plaintiff:
James Joseph Burke, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUPERSMITH et al v. PIAKER & LYONS, P.C. et al
as 1:2014cv05681
Plaintiff:
NEAL A. CUPERSMITH , FRANCES CUPERSMITH , CYNTHIA ROBBINS and others
Defendant:
PIAKER & LYONS, P.C. , RONALD L. SIMONS and TIMOTHY N. PAVENTI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: James Burke, Jr.
as 12-2705
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES A. BURKE, JR.
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BERKS COUNTY
David Mulholland, et al v. Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, et al
as 11-3412
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID MULHOLLAND and MEGAN MULLHOLLAND, Husband and Wife
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIV HOSP, THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIV PHY, DORIA CATALDO, MD, individually and others
DONIGER et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv33742
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST , A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LLOYD et al v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2011cv01386
Plaintiff:
STEVEN C. LLOYD and PAUL STONE
Defendant:
DAVID F. CARNEY, SHAUN E. MCALMONT, SCOTT M. SHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv01388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
SCHWEERTMANN v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2010cv06686
Plaintiff:
MIKE SCHWEERTMANN
Defendant:
DAVID F. CARNEY , SHAUN E. MCALMONT , ALEXIS P. MICHAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
