Cases 1 - 10 of 21
David Meyers v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6407
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, VDOC Director, U.S. DISTRICT COURT ROANOKE DIVISION, ELIZABETH KAY DILLON, U.S. Judge and others
Meyers v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, U.S. District Court Roanoke Division, Elizabeth Dillon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orell Logan v. Ronald Angelone
as 23-6192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ORELL LOGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
RONALD J. ANGELONE, Prior Director, VDOC, GARY BASS, Prior Manager, CCS, VDOC, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, VDOC and others
David Meyers v. Muriel Pitney
as 22-7044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MURIEL-THERESA PITNEY, Clerk, DONALD LEMONS, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of Virginia, BETH COBELL, Sussex I State Prison Warden and others
Logan v. Clarke et al
as 1:2022cv00631
Plaintiff:
Orell L. Logan
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, James E. Parks, Ronald Angolone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Logan v. Angolone et al
as 1:2022cv00459
Plaintiff:
Orell Logan
Defendant:
Ronald Angolone, Gary Bass, Harold W. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Pitney et al
as 2:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Muriel Pitney, Donald Lemons, Beth Cobell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conner v. Doe et al
as 1:2021cv00366
Defendant:
James E. Parks, Nikita B. Murphy, K. Breeding and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald T. Conner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winston v. Kinsley et al
as 2:2019cv00563
Defendant:
James E. Parks, Mrs. Pistner, U.M. Dale and others
Plaintiff:
LeAnthony Winston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
