Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Reynolds v. Stewart et al
as 4:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Loren-Michael Reynolds
Defendant:
James E. Stewart, Sr., Judge Emanuel, Senae Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bushansky v. Keane Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv02924
Defendant:
Robert W. Drummond, Keane Group, Inc., Christian A. Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Gee et al v. Gross et al
as 4:2018cv00369
Plaintiff:
Rebekah Gee , Jeff Landry , James E Stewart, Sr and others
Defendant:
Robert Gross and Bossier City Medical Suite
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Booth Family Trust v. Baker Hughes Incorporated et al
as 4:2017cv01457
Plaintiff:
Booth Family Trust
Defendant:
Baker Hughes Incorporated , Martin S. Craighead , Gregory D. Brenneman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stewart v. Ortiz
as 4:2016cv03077
Plaintiff:
James D Stewart
Defendant:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Ortiz
as 1:2016cv00267
Plaintiff:
James D Stewart
Defendant:
Madeline Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barton et al v. Nabors Industries, Ltd. et al
as 6:2015cv00733
Plaintiff:
Brian Barton , Lawrence Wayne Bruce , Michael Fuller, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Nabors Industries, Ltd. , Nabors Industires, Inc. and Express Payroll, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Rovner v. Baker Hughes Incorporated et al
as 4:2014cv03416
Plaintiff:
Marc Rovner
Defendant:
Baker Hughes Incorporated, Clarence P. Cazalot, Jr., Martin S. Craighead and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
United States of America v. Stewart
as 4:2014mc00068
Respondent:
James M. Stewart
Petitioner:
United States of America
Fountain v. Livingston et al
as 6:2013cv00588
Plaintiff:
Freddie Fountain
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, John A Rupert, Larry G Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
