Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Pauley v. Uphold et al
as 3:2021cv00153
Plaintiff:
James Allen Pauley
Defendant:
Mary Uphold, Styre and Angie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pauley v. Styre et al
as 1:2021cv00115
Plaintiff:
James Allen Pauley, Jr.
Defendant:
Styre, Nurse Angie and Mary Uphold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clements v. WV Divisions of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2019cv00172
Plaintiff:
James Allen Clements
Defendant:
Mike Francis, Prime Care Medical, WV Divisions of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv20047
Plaintiff:
Tami Fox Cooper and James Allen Cooper
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv12772
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Allen and James Allen
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv12300
Plaintiff:
Linda Allen and James Allen
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hemphill et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv05064
Plaintiff:
Theresa Ann Hemphill and James Allen Hemphill
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Allen et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv04453
Plaintiff:
Kathey Allen and James Allen
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Goll et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv07297
Plaintiff:
Julie Goll and James Allen Goll, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cottrill v. Barnabei
as 5:2010cv00023
Plaintiff:
James Allen Cottrill
Defendant:
David A. Barnabei
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
