Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Roberts v. McFadden et al
as 6:2023cv06230
Plaintiff:
Chavana Roberts
Defendant:
Johnathan McFadden, Tiffany Kincade, Chardonnae Barfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Carr v. Brian Cota, et al
as 23-55086
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES CARR
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN JOSEPH COTA and UNKNOWN NAMED DEFENDANTS, 1-10
James Carr v. Cathy Murillo, et al
as 23-55010
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES CARR
Defendant / Appellee:
CATHY MURILLO, ERIC FRIEDMAN, OSCAR GUTIERREZ and others
Defendant:
ALAN MALIK, JANET MALIK, BRETT QUEENER and others
James Carr v. Brian Joseph Cota
as 2:2022cv08359
Plaintiff:
James Carr
Defendant:
Brian Joseph Cota and Unknown Named Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Carr v. Cathy Murillo et al
as 2:2022cv06677
Plaintiff:
James Carr
Defendant:
Cathy Murillo, Eric Friedman, Oscar Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Carr v. Joyce Dudley, et al
as 22-55810
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES CARR
Defendant / Appellee:
JOYCE EDEN DUDLEY, BRIAN JOSEPH COTA, DANIEL MCGREW and others
James Carr v. Joyce Eden Dudley et al
as 2:2022cv04897
Plaintiff:
JAMES CARR
Defendant:
JOYCE EDEN DUDLEY, BRIAN JOSEPH COTA, DANIEL McGREW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Carr v. Joyce Eden Dudley et al
as 2:2022cv03576
Plaintiff:
JAMES CARR
Defendant:
JOYCE EDEN DUDLEY, BRIAN JOSEPH COTA, DANIEL McGREW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1322 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
