Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
Corey Moody v. Danielle Hollandsworth We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1814
Plaintiff - Appellant: COREY MOODY
Defendant - Appellee: DANIELLE HOLLANDSWORTH, individually and RANDY GIBSON, individually
Defendant: CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS, VIRGINIA, JAMES D. FOX, in his official capacity, RICHARD W. MYERS, in his official capacity and others
John M. Dickson, Jr. v. FBI We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-2168
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN M. DICKSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Newport News field office, John/Jane Doe (s) Supervisor Technical agent (s), Acting as a person (s) and member (s) of a criminal enterprise Under Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Newport News field office, John/Jane Doe (s) Technical agent (s), Acting as a person (s) and member (s) of a criminal enterprise Under Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Newport News field office, John/Jane Doe (s) Supervisor field agent (s), Acting as a person (s) and member (s) of a criminal enterprise Under Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) and others
States Self-Insurers Risk Retention Group, Inc. v. City of Newport News, Virginia et al
as 4:2015cv00105
Plaintiff: States Self-Insurers Risk Retention Group, Inc.
Defendant: City of Newport News, Virginia, Thomas E. Bennett, Patricia L. Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract › Insurance
Dickson v. Federal Bureau of Investigation Newport News field office, John/Jane Doe (s) Supervisor Technical agent (s) et al
as 4:2015cv00092
Plaintiff: John M. Dickson, Jr.
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Investigation Newport News field office, John/Jane Doe (s) Supervisor Technical agent (s), Federal Bureau of Investigation Newport News field office, John/Jane Doe (s) Technical agent (s), Federal Bureau of Investigation Newport News field office, John/Jane Doe (s) Supervisor field agent (s) and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
John Dickson, Jr. v. Sorel Utsey We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1926
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN M. DICKSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: OFFICER SOREL V. UTSEY, in his official and individual capacity, CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS POLICE CHIEF JAMES D. FOX, in his official and individual capacity, acting under color of state law, CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS POLICE DEPARTMENT, in its official capacity, and as a person acting under color of state law and others
Moody v. The City of Newport News, Virginia et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00099
Plaintiff: Corey Moody
Defendant: The City of Newport News, Virginia , James D. Fox , Richard W. Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickson v. Utsey et al
as 4:2013cv00057
Plaintiff: John M. Dickson, Jr.
Defendant: Officer Sorel V. Utsey, City of Newport News Police Chief James D. Fox, City Of Newport News Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hieda Keeler v. James Fox We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1328
Plaintiff - Appellant: HIEDA A. KEELER
Defendant - Appellee: POLICE CHIEF JAMES D. FOX, OFFICER THOMAS A. SHULL, JR., OFFICER JUSTIN BRIGGS and others
Hieda Keeler v. James Fox We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-2447
Plaintiff - Appellant: HIEDA A. KEELER
Defendant - Appellee: JAMES D. FOX, Police Chief, THOMAS A. SHULL, JR., Officer, OFFICER GREEN and others
Keeler v. Newport News Police Department et al
as 2:2012cv00325
Plaintiff: Hieda A. Keeler
Defendant: Newport News Police Department, James D. Fox, Thomas A. Shull, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?