Cases 1 - 10 of 18
SARRIO v. WARD et al
as 5:2019cv00140
Defendant:
GUARD RICK FOSKEY, COUNSELOR STEPHENS, SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES DAVID SARRIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burrage v. Gordy et al
as 4:2018cv00092
Petitioner:
James David Burrage
Respondent:
Christopher Gordy, Attorney General for the State of Georgia and Chattooga County District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Burrage v. Gordy et al
as 1:2018cv01170
Petitioner:
James David Burrage
Respondent:
Christopher Gordy, Attorney General for the State of Georgia and Chattooga County District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Phillips v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2018cv00051
Petitioner:
James David Phillips
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Owenby v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv04381
Plaintiff:
James David Owenby
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Georgia Diagnostics and Classification Prison, Sellers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owenby v. Cobb County Jail et al
as 1:2016cv03884
Plaintiff:
James David Owenby
Defendant:
Cobb County Jail, Cobb County Sheriff's Department and Cobb County Board of Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seal v. Bentley et al
as 6:2016cv01151
Petitioner:
James David Seal
Respondent:
John H Bentley and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thompson v. Bentley, et al. (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00784
Plaintiff:
James David Thompson
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PELKEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2012cv00397
Petitioner:
JAMES DAVID PELKEY
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nottle v. Gee et al
as 8:2012cv01239
Plaintiff:
James David Nottle
Defendant:
David A. Gee and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
