Cases 91 - 100 of 465
Madero Pouncil v. James Tilton, et al
as 10-80127
Plaintiff - Respondent:
MADERO L. POUNCIL
Defendant - Petitioner:
JAMES E. TILTON, Director, CDC, MATTHEW CATE, Secretary of the CDC, D. FOSTON, Facility Captain and others
Smith v. Cate et al
as 1:2010cv01088
Plaintiff:
Rodney Smith
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, James E. Tilton, James A. Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Zentory Bean v. James Tilton
as 10-16253
Petitioner - Appellant:
ZENTORY T. BEAN
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Raynell Carmichael v. David Claren, et al
as 10-16151
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYNELL CARMICHAEL
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID CLAREN, HOPKING, RODERICK HICKMAN and others
LeGrante Ellis v. James Tilton, et al
as 10-16145
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEGRANTE V. ELLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, Director of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations, P. ENRIQUEZ, Facility Captain, NORTH KERN STATE PRISON and others
Mario Navarro v. Derral Adams, et al
as 10-55791
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARIO LOUIS NAVARRO
Respondent - Appellee:
DERRAL G. ADAMS, Warden (A) Corcoran
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, JAMES E. TILTON and SECRETARY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION
Marco Salazar v. James Tilton
as 10-55740
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARCO ANTONIO SALAZAR
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON
Anthony Johnson v. James Tilton
as 10-55703
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON
Mark Wilson v. Mike Poulos, et al
as 10-55653
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE POULOS, LORI DI CARLO, MATTHEW CATE and others
Lyle Crook v. James Tilton
as 10-55622
Petitioner - Appellant:
LYLE A. CROOK
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, CDC Secretary
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
