Cases 21 - 30 of 229
Michael A Loza v. James E Tilton et al
as 2:2011cv01437
Respondent:
Attorney General of California and James E Tilton
Petitioner:
Michael A Loza
Theodore O'Dell Wilson v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2008cv05268
Respondent:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Does, G. D. Gross and others
Petitioner:
Theodore O'Dell Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glenn L. Boyd Jr. v. Domingo Uribe Jr.
as 5:2010cv01648
Defendant:
Alameida, R Allen, S Barringer and others
Petitioner:
Glenn L Boyd, Jr.
Respondent:
Domingo Uribe, Jr.
Alfaro v. Tilton et al
as 5:2010cv04416
Plaintiff:
Cesar Alfaro
Defendant:
James E. Tilton, G. Lewis, D. Higgerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bibbs v. Tilton et al
as 4:2010cv03999
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Bibbs
Defendant:
James E. Tilton, Greg Lewis, Bryan Kingston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karyl Clarke v. Ebony Larry et al
as 2:2010cv06066
Defendant:
Charle Beck, Charle Beck, William Bratton and others
Plaintiff:
Karyl Clarke
Jose Mendoza v. Tom Felker et al
as 2:2007cv02541
Respondent:
Tom Felker and James E Tilton
Petitioner:
Jose Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Cate et al
as 1:2010cv01088
Plaintiff:
Rodney Smith
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, James E. Tilton, James A. Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Theodore O'Dell Wilson v. Arnold Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2010cv02306
Respondent:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., K. Covington, Does and others
Petitioner:
Theodore O'Dell Wilson
Rios v. CDCR, et al
as 1:2008cv01048
Petitioner:
Reno Fuentes Rios
Respondent:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation , Attorney General of the State of California, James E. Tilton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
