Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Johnson et al v. Flood Brothers, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01289
Plaintiff:
Derek Johnson , Eldridge Cooper and James Elder
Defendant:
Flood Brothers, Inc. and John Flood
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00966
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Elder v. Walmart and Claims Management Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00226
Plaintiff:
James Elder
Defendant:
Walmart and Claims Management Inc and Walmart Workers Compensation Plan for Wyoming
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
James Elder v. Commissioner of Social Securit
as 11-55409
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ELDER
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Off. of Dis. Adjud. & Review
Torpey et al v. CMA Mechanical Construction Corp.
as 1:2010cv09521
Plaintiff:
John J. Torpey , John Enright , Christopher Sheeran and others
Defendant:
CMA Mechanical Construction Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 184
James Elder v. Commissioner of Social Securit
as 10-56998
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ELDER
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Off. of Dis. Adjud. & Review
Torpey et al v. Enterprise A/C Corp.
as 1:2010cv08646
Plaintiff:
John J. Torpey , Alexander E. Gettler , Christopher Sheeran and others
Defendant:
Enterprise A/C Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
James Elder v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2010cv01353
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
James Elder
Torpey et al v. The PAR Group
as 1:2009cv09401
Plaintiff:
John J. Torpey, John Enright, Christopher Sheeran and others
Defendant:
The PAR Group
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor Management Relations Act of 1947
Elders v. Secretary, DOC et al
as 2:2009cv00066
Petitioner:
James Elders
Respondent:
Secretary, DOC and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
