Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Clark v. Rozak et al
as 1:2017cv02230
Plaintiff:
Ian Kelly Clark
Defendant:
Daniel J Rozak, Andrea Lynn Chasteen, Erin M. Krone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burley v. Bollingbrook Police Dept et al
as 1:2016cv04289
Plaintiff:
Diane E. Burley, Melissa Agunloye and D'Anne Burley
Defendant:
Bollingbrook Police Dept, Tom Ross, James Glasgow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Clark v. Kelly et al
as 1:2015cv06506
Plaintiff:
Ian Kelly Clark
Defendant:
Mike Kelly, Daniel J Rozak, Frank A. Astrella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Landerman v. Hosey et al
as 1:2014cv09910
Plaintiff:
Adam Landerman
Defendant:
Joe Hosey, City Of Joliet, Officer(s) John Doe(s) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chance v. Glasgow
as 1:2014cv09264
Plaintiff:
Jason Chance
Defendant:
James Glasgow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turks v. Friefeld et al
as 1:2014cv09118
Plaintiff:
Verlonzo Turks
Defendant:
Bruce N. Friefeld, James Glasgow, Edward Burmila, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Glasgow
as 1:2013cv01480
Plaintiff:
Bobbi Smith
Defendant:
James Glasgow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Diehl et al v. Rarity Bay Community Association Inc. et al (TV1)
as 3:2012cv00499
Receiver:
Sterling P Owen, IV
Plaintiff:
Bruce Diehl and Julianne M. Diehl
Defendant:
Rarity Bay Community Association Inc. , James Glasgow , Carolyn B Beatty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Simpson v. Meijer, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv06217
Plaintiff:
James Simpson
Defendant:
Meijer, Inc. , James Glasgow and the Office of the Will County State's Attorney, James Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorian v. Kaupas et al
as 1:2011cv07255
Defendant:
Paul Kaupas, Sheriff of Will County, James Glasgow and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Dorian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
