Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Holmes (PS) v. City of Lafayette et al
as 1:2023cv01946
Plaintiff:
James H. Holmes
Defendant:
City of Lafayette, Jd Mangat and Rick Bashor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Peck et al
as 1:2023cv00814
Plaintiff:
James H. Holmes
Defendant:
Joan Peck, Brian J. Bagley, Don Haddad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LePlatt v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2022cv01126
Plaintiff:
James LePlatt and James H. LePlatt
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company and Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Wilhelm v. RigNet, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00674
Defendant:
Kevin J. O'Hara, James H. Browning, Ditlef de Vibe and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Baker v. RigNet, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00566
Defendant:
Kevin J. O'Hara, James H. Browning, Royal Acquisition Sub, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lewis D. Baker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Waugh v. RigNet, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00499
Defendant:
Kevin J. O'Hara, James H. Browning, Ditlef de Vibe and others
Plaintiff:
Christine Waugh
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 10
Hunter v. Williams
as 1:2020cv01562
Petitioner:
James H. Hunter
Respondent:
Dean Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Higby et al v. Williams et al
as 1:2020cv01339
Plaintiff:
James H. Higby, Joshua Gallegos and Jacob D. Oakley
Defendant:
Dean Williams and Offender Services Move Committee (C.D.O.C.)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gallegos et al v. Daughenbach et al
as 1:2020cv01337
Plaintiff:
Joshua Gallegos, Jacob D. Oakley and James H. Higby
Defendant:
Moore, Scott Daughenbach, Medical Nursing Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oakley v. Williams et al
as 1:2020cv01336
Plaintiff:
Joshua Gallegos, Jacob D. Oakley and James H. Higby
Defendant:
(I) Simpson, Brody (I) Shaffer, Brody Shaffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
