Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Kerchen et al v. University of Michigan et al
as 4:2022cv12492
Defendant:
University of Michigan, James H Woods, Christian Raphalides and others
Plaintiff:
Heather Kerchen, Lori Kerchen and Dale Kerchen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Coffman v. Zix Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv12868
Plaintiff:
Catherine Coffman
Defendant:
Zix Corporation, Mark J. Bonney, Marcy Campbell and others
Ryan v. Zix Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv12835
Plaintiff:
John Ryan
Defendant:
Zix Corporation, Mark J. Bonney, Marcy Campbell and others
Grinberger v. Zix Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv12817
Plaintiff:
Abraham Grinberger
Defendant:
Zix Corporation, Mark J. Bonney, Marcy Campbell and others
Cole et al v. Snyder et al
as 5:2019cv12709
Defendant:
Bradley Wurfel, Daugherty Johnson, Gerald Ambrose and others
Plaintiff:
Randell Kelley, Denise Cooper Sawyers, Rebecca Deacons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Dependable Cleaning Carpet and Upholstery Co. et al
as 2:2019cv12095
Defendant:
Dependable Cleaning Carpet and Upholstery Co. and James H. Tremp
Plaintiff:
Dominic Scott
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Currie v. Andrews et al
as 2:2016cv14153
Plaintiff:
Marlon Currie
Defendant:
Thomas Andrews, Michigan, State of, United States of America and others
Anderson v. Aramark Facility Service LLC et al
as 2:2016cv12397
Plaintiff:
James H Anderson
Defendant:
Aramark Facility Service LLC, Diana Curtis, Bobby Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Anderson v. Aramark Facility Service LLC et al
as 2:2016cv12398
Plaintiff:
James H Anderson
Defendant:
Aramark Facility Service LLC , Diana Curtis , Bobby Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sims #258763 v. Morales et al
as 1:2016cv00174
Plaintiff:
James H. Sims #258763
Defendant:
Carmen Morales, Aaron Freeman, Corey Walendzik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
