Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Daniel Harper v. California State Prison Lancaster et al
as 2:2024cv01789
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Harper
Defendant:
California State Prison Lancaster and CSP Lancaster Mail Room
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel James Harper v. CSP Lancaster et al
as 2:2024cv01748
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Harper
Defendant:
CSP Lancaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel James Harper v. California State Prison Lancaster et al
as 2:2024cv01875
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Harper
Defendant:
California State Prison Lancaster, CSP Lancaster Appeals Coordinator and CSP Lancaster my room staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Saul
as 3:2021cv00556
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
James Harper Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id
Daniel Harper v. Jennifer Heinisch
as 2:2021cv02121
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Harper
Defendant:
Jennifer Heinisch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel James Harper v. CDCR et al
as 2:2020cv10498
Defendant:
Windfeld and CDCR
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Harper v. A. Martin
as 2:2020cv09796
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper and Daniel James Harper
Defendant:
A. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00221
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
James Harper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ricardo Acosta et al v. City of Los Angeles
as 2:2014cv05690
Plaintiff:
Steve Sainz, Martin Martinez, Lee Jensen and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does 1 through 10 inclusive
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Steven Pearl
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Harper v. Williams et al
as 2:2007cv02166
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Harper
Defendant:
R - Williams and - Chamberlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
