Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Davis v. Heimgartner, et al
as 16-3012
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY LEROY DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES HEIMGARTNER, Warden, El Dorado Correctional Facility and BUTLER COUNTY, KANSAS
Nunez (ID 84911) v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2015cv03259
Plaintiff:
Eddie Nunez
Defendant:
James Heimgartner , Tammy Martin-Mosley , R. Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grissom (ID 33728) v. Roberts et al
as 5:2015cv03221
Plaintiff:
Richard Grissom
Defendant:
Raymond Roberts , Johnnie Goddard , James Heimgartner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. McGuire, et al
as 15-3218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIS JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH L. MCGUIRE, JAMES HEIMGARTNER and VICKIE BRUMGARDT
Toney (ID 71755) v. Harrod et al
as 5:2015cv03209
Plaintiff:
Michael M. Toney
Defendant:
Gordon Harrod, (fnu) Nickelson , James Heimgartner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Astorga (ID 94963) v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2015cv03191
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ernest Astorga
Defendant:
James Heimgartner and (fnu) Vick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson (ID 77685) v. King et al
as 5:2015cv03183
Plaintiff:
Anthony T. Jackson
Defendant:
Amanda King, Kevin Edwards and James Heimgartner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beauclair v. Roberts, et al
as 15-3046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY ELLIOTT BEAUCLAIR
Defendant - Appellee:
RAY ROBERTS, Secretary of Corrections, in his personal and official capacity, JAMES HEIMGARTNER, FNU COCHRAN and others
Batista (ID 46123) v. Sapien et al
as 5:2015cv03039
Plaintiff:
Raul Batista
Defendant:
Robert Sapien and James Heimgartner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunlap (ID 108228) v. Livingood et al
as 5:2015cv03025
Plaintiff:
Marcus P. Dunlap
Defendant:
(fnu) Livingood, (fnu) McGuire, James Heimgartner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
