Cases 61 - 70 of 125
Grissom (ID 33728) v. Roberts et al
as 5:2015cv03221
Plaintiff:
Richard Grissom
Defendant:
Raymond Roberts , Johnnie Goddard , James Heimgartner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. McGuire, et al
as 15-3218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIS JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH L. MCGUIRE, JAMES HEIMGARTNER and VICKIE BRUMGARDT
Toney (ID 71755) v. Harrod et al
as 5:2015cv03209
Plaintiff:
Michael M. Toney
Defendant:
Gordon Harrod, (fnu) Nickelson , James Heimgartner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Astorga (ID 94963) v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2015cv03191
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ernest Astorga
Defendant:
James Heimgartner and (fnu) Vick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson (ID 77685) v. King et al
as 5:2015cv03183
Plaintiff:
Anthony T. Jackson
Defendant:
Amanda King, Kevin Edwards and James Heimgartner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis (ID 06598) v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2015cv03178
Petitioner:
Anthony Leroy Davis
Respondent:
James Heimgartner and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pruitt v. Heimgartner, et al
as 15-3118
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD JOEL PRUITT
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES HEIMGARTNER, Warden, El Dorado Correctional Facility, MARY NELSON, Deputy Warden, El Dorado Correctional Facility SEU and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS
James (ID 77522) v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2015cv03116
Petitioner:
Tyron James
Respondent:
James Heimgartner and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Ro
as 15-3082
Petitioner:
HARVEY L. ROSS
Respondent:
JAMES HEIMGARTNER, Warden, El Dorado Correctional Facility and DEREK SCHMIDT, Attorney General
Gaines (ID 33515) v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2015cv03053
Petitioner:
Michael L. Gaines
Respondent:
James Heimgartner and Derek Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
