Cases 11 - 20 of 21
ARVIZU et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05820
Plaintiff:
MARGARET ARVIZU , FREDDIE CASTEEL , JIM CASTEEL and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
HILL et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2012cv06854
Plaintiff:
JAMES HILL , MILDRED HILL , NEHISHA HILL and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Feldon Bush, Sr. v. Edward Rendell
as 12-2221
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FELDON BUSH, SR., JAMES HILL and ANTHONY ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD G. RENDELL, SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LAMAS and others
USA v. Hill
as 11-1185
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES HILL
Bush et al v. Rendell et al
as 1:2010cv02246
Plaintiff:
Feldon Bush, Sr., James Hill and Anthony Allen
Defendant:
Ed Rendell, Secretary of Department of Corrections, Lamas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv76008
Plaintiff:
JAMES HILL
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ASHWORTH, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86527
Plaintiff:
JAMES HILL ASHWORTH
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HILL v. WESTINHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv79619
Plaintiff:
JAMES HILL
Defendant:
WESTINHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, ABER INSULATION, ABNEY MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HILL v. E.D. BULLARD et al
as 2:2008cv62067
Plaintiff:
JAMES HILL, JAMES HILL, JAMES HILL and others
Defendant:
E.D. BULLARD, ATLAS TURNER, INC., ATLAS TURNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
