Cases 21 - 30 of 73
Smith v. Wexford Health of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv00062
Plaintiff:
Torey Cortez Smith
Defendant:
Wexford Health of Corrections, Jarron Kimbel, Montre Bisoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Holman
as 5:2013cv00001
Plaintiff:
Demario D. Walker
Defendant:
James Holman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Webster v. Epps et al
as 3:2012cv00858
Plaintiff:
Melissa Elaine Webster
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt Sparkman, James Holman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Singleton v. Holman
as 1:2012cv00356
Plaintiff:
Daniel Israel Singleton
Defendant:
James Holman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garner v. Epps et al
as 3:2012cv00769
Plaintiff:
James Emory Garner
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt L. Sparkman, James Holman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoskins v. Murphy et al
as 3:2012cv00746
Plaintiff:
Ocie Hoskins, Jr.
Defendant:
Tiffany Murphy, Christopher Epps and James Holman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoskins v. Casey et al
as 3:2012cv00737
Plaintiff:
Ocie Hoskins
Defendant:
Eddie Casey, James Holman, Unknown West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. Holman
as 3:2012cv00713
Plaintiff:
Marvin Ray Berry
Defendant:
James Holman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Browning, Jr. v. Staff at USP Big Sandy, et al
as 12-6215
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES HOLMAN BROWNING, JR.
Defendant:
STAFF AT USP BIG SANDY
Defendant - Appellee:
BENJAMIN PENNINGTON, aka L. T. Pennerton, TIM FAZENBAKER, MYRON L. BATTS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
