Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sanford-Macklin v. Donachy, Jr. et al
as 2:2021cv02032
Defendant:
Penske Truck Leasing Company, LP d/b/a Penske Truck Rental and James Howard Donachy, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Sanford-Macklin
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rippy v. Campbell et al
as 3:2020cv01010
Defendant:
James Howard Campbell and Werner Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lori Rippy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shell et al v. Lafever et al
as 3:2017cv00784
Plaintiff:
James Howard Shell and Nannette Cobb Shell
Defendant:
Crystal Ciara Lafever and Jackee Lafever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. USA (RHC)
as 3:2016cv00351
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Howard Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Harmon v. Williams et al
as 3:2016cv00319
Plaintiff:
James Howard Harmon, Jr.
Defendant:
Grainger Williams, Kenneth Mathews and Southern Health Partners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard et al v. Knox County, TN et al (TV1)
as 3:2015cv00006
Defendant:
Knox County, Tennessee , Knox County Board of Education , Timothy Wiegenstein and others
Plaintiff:
Alan James Howard, Sr and Virginia Marie Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Harmon v. Baird et al (VVV)
as 3:2014cv00430
Plaintiff:
James Howard Harmon, Jr.
Defendant:
Therman Baird, Jeremy Huddleston and Shawn Bannach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harmon v. Clark et al (TVV)
as 3:2013cv00592
Plaintiff:
James Howard Harmon, Jr.
Defendant:
Dave Clark, Ryan M Spitzer, Brian Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harmon v. U.S. Prisoner Transports et al
as 3:2012cv00374
Defendant:
U.S. Prisoner Transports, James Berrong and Paul White
Plaintiff:
James Howard Harmon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
