Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Dale v. Roy et al
as 0:2018cv00886
Plaintiff:
James Irving Dale
Defendant:
Tom Roy, Kathryn Halvorson, Nola Karow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Irving Dale v. CBM Correctional Food Services, et al
as 16-4542
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Irving Dale
Defendant - Appellee:
CBM Correctional Food Services, Darin Young, Warden at South Dakota State Penitentiary, in his individual and offical capacity, Robert Dooley, Warden at MDSP and Director of Prison Operations for South Dakota Department of Corrections, in his individual and offical capacity and others
Dale v. CBM Correctional Food Services et al
as 4:2016cv04133
Plaintiff:
James Irving Dale
Defendant:
CBM Correctional Food Services, Robert Dooley, Darin Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dale v. Young
as 1:2016cv01037
Petitioner:
James Irving Dale
Respondent:
Darin Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
James Irving Dale v. Darin Young
as 16-1633
Petitioner - Appellant:
James Irving Dale
Respondent - Appellee:
Darin Young
Dale v. Ketcher et al
as 4:2016cv04024
Plaintiff:
James Irving Dale
Defendant:
James Robert Ketcher, Travis Tjeerdsma, Tammy Dejong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dale v. Young
as 4:2016cv04006
Petitioner:
James Irving Dale
Respondent:
Darin Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dale et al v. Kaemingk et al
as 4:2015cv04103
Plaintiff:
James Irving Dale, Brian Michael Holzer, Michael Eugene Koch and others
Defendant:
Dennis Kaemingk, Robert Dooley, Joshua Klimek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dale v. Dejong et al
as 4:2014cv04102
Plaintiff:
James Irving Dale
Defendant:
Kelly Tjeerdsma, Michael Meyer, Rebecca Schiefer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Irving Dale v. Joel L. Brott, et al
as 13-3412
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Irving Dale
Defendant - Appellee:
Joel L. Brott, Brian Frank, Angela Knutson and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
