Cases 1 - 10 of 11
JEWELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv22736
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES JEWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jewell v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv10786
Plaintiff:
Dennis James Jewell
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Jewell v. General Projection Systems, Inc.
as 6:2014cv00712
Plaintiff:
James Jewell
Defendant:
General Projection Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Ingram v. Bryant et al
as 9:2013cv02165
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ingram
Defendant:
Bruce Bryant , Tammy Dover and James Jewell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Dietrich v. Bryant et al
as 1:2012cv03501
Plaintiff:
David Micheal Dietrich
Defendant:
Bruce Bryant, Richard L Martin, Chief Arwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harmon v. Bryant et al
as 4:2012cv03417
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jerome Harmon
Defendant:
Bruce M Bryant, James F Arwood, Richard L Martin, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Poe v. Bryant et al
as 9:2012cv03142
Plaintiff:
Richard Keith Poe
Defendant:
Sheriff Bryant, Richard L Martin, James Jewell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Esskew v. Arwood et al
as 6:2012cv01354
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kelly Esskew
Defendant:
Freddie Arwood, Bruce Bryant, Richard Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Massey v. Moss Justice York County Detention Center et al
as 1:2012cv01355
Plaintiff:
John K Massey, Jr
Defendant:
Moss Justice York County Detention Center, Tammy Dover and James Jewell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belk v. Bryant et al
as 0:2011cv02570
Plaintiff:
Jamar Lavert Belk
Defendant:
Bruce Bryant, Freddie Arwood, Richard Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
