Cases 1 - 10 of 65
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Johnson et al
as 3:2023cv03229
Plaintiff:
Jamie Phillips
Defendant:
James Johnson, Joseph Gwaltney, Tyson Satterfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMullan v. Leffler et al
as 4:2023cv04089
Plaintiff:
Artez McMullan
Defendant:
Bryan Leffler, James Johnson, Paul Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Misner et al
as 2:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Johnson
Defendant:
Michael Misner, Officer Phillip Briski, Officer Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Johnson et al
as 3:2023cv00948
Plaintiff:
Travis G. Allen
Defendant:
James Johnson, Jill Moore, Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Johnson v. Ghaliah Obaisi, et al
as 22-1620
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GHALIAH OBAISI, as independent Executor of the Estate of DR. SALEH OBAISI, ARTHUR FUNK, Doctor, NICOLETTE DUFFIELD, Medical Administrator and others
Johnson v. IDOC et al
as 3:2021cv00450
Defendant:
Devin E. Sullens, John Doe and IDOC
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Litherland et al
as 3:2021cv00449
Defendant:
Steven Meeks, Jane Doe 1, Dr. Litherland and others
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leventhal v. Johnson
as 2:2021cv00507
Petitioner:
Howard E Leventhal
Respondent:
James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Kahl et al
as 3:2020cv03335
Defendant:
Mary Dambacher, Jennifer Watson, Macoupin County State of Illinois and others
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
