Cases 21 - 30 of 104
Johnson v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2020cv01056
Defendant:
Denver Hedrick, John Baldwin, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Boland et al
as 1:2020cv01021
Defendant:
. Boland and Kaetlyn Schmidt
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2019cv02314
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, EVELYN MCDONALD, HUNT and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Susan Tomas v. Illinois Department of Employm, et al
as 19-2011
Defendant / Appellee:
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, DIANN WARE, PATRICIA OUSLEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSAN M. TOMAS
Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft et al v. The Partnerships and Unicorporated Associations Identified On Schedule "A"
as 1:2019cv02498
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unicorporated Associations Identified On Schedule "A", chimera official store, cheap randomness store and others
Plaintiff:
Swarovski North America Limited, Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft and 3c-base
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Johnson v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
as 1:2019cv02052
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
as 1:2019cv00705
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff:
JAMES JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tomlinson v. Sciortino et al
as 2:2019cv00058
Defendant:
Sheriff James Johnson, Kickhaver and Dominic Sciortino
Plaintiff:
Ernest T Tomlinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Brumleve
as 3:2018cv01830
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Kyle A. Brumleve
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Pfister
as 3:2018cv01831
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Warden Randy Pfister
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
