Cases 11 - 20 of 72
Andrews v. Johnson et al
as 1:2021cv10726
Plaintiff:
Carl Andrews
Defendant:
James Johnson, Daneiel H. Wolf, Kevin Keating and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Andrews v. Johnson et al
as 1:2021cv08310
Plaintiff:
Carl Andrews
Defendant:
James Johnson, Daniel H. Wolf, Kevin Keating and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. Johnson et al
as 2:2021cv05673
Plaintiff:
Carl Andrews
Defendant:
James Johnson, Judge Gary R. Brown, Daniel H. Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Roe v. City of New York
as 21-2437
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Roe, Jane Roe and Jane Roe 1
Defendant / Appellee:
City of New York, Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., in his individual and official capacity as District Attorney of the New York County District Attorney's Office, et al., NYPD and others
United States of America v. Johnson (McCallum)
as 21-1372
Defendant:
James Johnson, AKA Jimmy, Kenneth Moore, AKA Doogie, Gerald Martin, AKA G-Rite and others
Defendant / Appellant:
James McCallum, AKA Baby James
Appellee:
United States of America
Hansen v. Johnson
as 2:2021cv00409
Respondent:
James Johnson
Petitioner:
Nicholas Hansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cortez v. Cuomo et al
as 7:2021cv00126
Defendant:
Govenor Andrew M. Cuomo, James O'Gorman, Jeff McCoy and others
Plaintiff:
Paul V. Cortez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunes v. Johnson
as 9:2020cv01516
Petitioner:
Carlson Nunes
Respondent:
James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roe et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv09635
Defendant:
Ivo Spanedda, FDNY, Staples Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Roe 1, Jane Roe and John Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
