Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Witzlib v. Santelle
as 2:2015cv00211
Plaintiff:
Bodie B Witzlib
Defendant:
James L Santelle , Kevin Carr , Stephanie Mott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Khan v. United States of America et al
as 2:2014cv00285
Plaintiff:
Dianne Khan
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Marshals Service, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Z3 Technologies Inc v. Holder et al
as 2:2013cv00682
Plaintiff:
Z3 Technologies Inc
Defendant:
Eric H Holder, Jr, Alejandro Mayorkas and James L Santelle
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Collier v. United States of America et al
as 2:2013cv00329
Petitioner:
Edward Louis Collier
Respondent:
United States of America , Jon Sanfilippo, Matthew L Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00122
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lead_plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
O'Grady, Michael v. Carlson, Tersa et al
as 3:2012cv00388
Plaintiff:
Michael O'Grady
Defendant:
Teresa L. Carlson and James L. Santelle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Grady v. Habeck et al
as 2:2011cv01028
Plaintiff:
Michael S O'Grady
Defendant:
James Roy Habeck, Habeck Law Office, Julie A Kerksick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00804
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Melendrez v. Office of General Counsel, et al
as 1:2010cv01135
Plaintiff:
Jose Melendrez, Jr
Defendant:
Office of General Counsel, Eric H Holder, Jr, James L Santelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 2:2007cv00852
Petitioner:
Jan F Becker
Respondent:
Warden Hudson, Russell D Feingold, Dave Obey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
