Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Conkleton v. Zavaras, et al
as 09-1076
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES K. CONKLETON
Defendant - Appellee:
ARISTEDES ZAVARAS, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections ("CDOC") in his official capacity, JOE STOMMEL, in his official capacity as the Program Administrator of the Sex Offender Treatment and Monitoring Program ("SOTMP") for the CDOC, JOHN MCGILL, in his individual and official capacity as Treatment provider for the DCOC's SOTMP and others
Collins v. Colorado Dept. of Corrections, et al
as 09-1067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID L. COLLINS
Defendant - Appellee:
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, ARISTEDES ZAVARAS and others
Davis v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2009cv00266
Plaintiff:
Glenn Davis
Defendant:
Aristedes Zavaras, Colorado Department of Corrections, Jim Moore and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Collins v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2008cv02657
Plaintiff:
David L. Collins
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Corrections Corporation of America, Aristedes Zavaras and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Conkleton v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2008cv02612
Plaintiff:
James K. Conkleton
Defendant:
Aristedes W. Zavaras, Joe Stommel, John (I) P. McGill and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ingraham v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2008cv02206
Plaintiff:
Gordon Ingraham
Defendant:
Joseph (I) Ortiz, Joseph Ortiz, Joe (I) Stommel and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Herman v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2007cv00798
Plaintiff:
Neil C. Herman
Defendant:
James Lander, Burl McCuller and Alicia Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2007cv00497
Plaintiff:
Claude Foster
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Gary Watkins, Tom Mizel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
