Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Alequine et al v. Baker et al
as 1:2011cv00008
Plaintiff:
Porifirio Alequine , Matthew Kurten , Tashawn Counts and others
Defendant:
James M. Baker , Monica Gonzalez-Gillespie , Michael Szczerba and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daoud v. City Of Wilmington et al
as 1:2010cv00987
Plaintiff:
Yasser F. Daoud
Defendant:
City Of Wilmington and James M. Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Schock et al v. Baker et al
as 1:2009cv00647
Plaintiff:
Albert Schock, Woldemar Schock and Irma Schock
Defendant:
James M. Baker, Jeffrey Starkey, Anthony Knisely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dalton v. Baker et al
as 1:2009cv00350
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Dalton, Jr.
Defendant:
James M. Baker, Leo Lynch, Paul Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
M.N. et al v. VIACOM INC. et al
as 2:2009cv62914
Plaintiff:
M.N., M.N., CAROL ANN BOHN and others
Defendant:
VIACOM INC., NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION, THE BOEING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Neuberger v. Baker et al
as 1:2007cv00723
Plaintiff:
Thomas S. Neuberger
Defendant:
James M. Baker, Leo Lynch, Ellis Blomquist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blake et al v. Healthcase C.M.S. et al
as 1:2007cv00405
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Blake, Anthony M. Walker, Michael A. Joy and others
Defendant:
Healthcase C.M.S., Raphael Williams, Carl C. Danberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Second Amendment Fdn, et al v. US Conf Mayors, et al
as 00-7188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Second Amendment Foundation, Alan Gottlieb, Joe Tataro and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Conference of Mayors, Shirley Dean, Mayor, Roosevelt Dorn, Mayor and others
Defendant - Terminated Party:
Omar Bradley, Mayor, R. B. Jones, Mayor, Richard J. Riordan, Mayor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
