Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Bradley v. Villarreal
as 5:2022cv01133
Plaintiff:
James Matthew Bradley
Defendant:
Alfredo R. Villarreal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv01036
Plaintiff:
James Matthew Bradley
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Robinson v. Caraway et al
as 2:2020cv00111
Defendant:
John Rathburn, Calvin Boyd, Mike Cummings and others
Plaintiff:
James Matthew Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley v. United States of America
as 5:2019cv00486
Plaintiff:
James Matthew Bradley, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Poole v. USA
as 6:2016cv00929
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Matthew Poole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Federal Trade Commission v. MDK Media, Inc. et al
as 5:2014mc00648
Defendant:
Casey Lee Adkisson, Anacapa Media LLC, Bear Communications LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Receiver:
Thomas W. McNamara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Matthews v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2010cv00505
Petitioner:
Buster James Matthews
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthews v. Quarterman
as 3:2008cv01450
Petitioner:
Buster James Matthews
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Matthews v. Board of Pardons and Parole et al
as 6:2008cv00090
Plaintiff:
Buster James Matthews
Defendant:
Board of Pardons and Parole and Unknown Parties 2 Through 5
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
