Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Donald Jones v. United States Supreme Court, et al
as 10-5222
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donald G. Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Supreme Court, William K. Suter, US Supreme Court Clerk of Court, Gail Johnson, US Supreme Court and others
JONES v. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT et al
as 1:2010cv00910
Plaintiff:
DONALD G. JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, WILLIAM K. SUTER, GAIL JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Cox v. Kahn et al
as 1:2010cv00653
Plaintiff:
Jessie Ray Cox
Defendant:
Thomas K. Kahn , James N. Hatten , John Ley and others
Skillern v. Hatten et al
as 1:2010cv00099
Plaintiff:
Warren Skillern
Defendant:
James N. Hatten and U. S. Marshall's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Moore v. Cobb County et al
as 1:2010cv00003
Plaintiff:
Derrick Anthony Moore
Defendant:
Cobb County, City of Marietta, Georgia, James N Hatten and others
Moore v. Cobb County et al
as 5:2009cv00444
Plaintiff:
Derrick Anthony Moore
Defendant:
Cobb County, City of Marietta, Georgia, James N Hatten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Hatten
as 1:2009mi00015
Plaintiff:
Jessie Ray Cox
Defendant:
James N. Hatten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Okpala v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2008cv03662
Plaintiff:
Okey Garry Okpala
Defendant:
Shirley J. Kennedy, James N. Hatten and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Eidson et al
as 1:2008cv02987
Plaintiff:
Jessie Ray Cox
Defendant:
Jeanette Eidson, William L. Martin, James N. Hatten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cox v. Eidson et al
as 1:2008mi00289
Plaintiff:
Jessie Ray Cox
Defendant:
Jeanette Eidson, William L. Martin, James N. Hatten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
