Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Grant v. Esper et al
as 1:2021cv00328
Defendant:
Mark Thomas Esper, James N. Mattis, Joseph F. Dunford and others
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01253
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00106
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00895
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Roe et al v. Defense et al
as 1:2018cv01565
Defendant:
Heather A. Wilson, James N. Mattis and United States Department of Defense
Plaintiff:
Victor Voe, OutServe-SLDN, Inc. and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
VISTA MACHINING COMPANY et al v. MATTIS et al
as 1:2018cv01440
Defendant:
James M. Coyne, Defense Logistics Agency, Darrell K. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Vista Machining Company and Richard Ross Hyde
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01317
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Harrison et al v. Mattis et al
as 1:2018cv00641
Plaintiff:
Nick Harrison and OutServe-SLDN, Inc.
Defendant:
James N. Mattis, Mark Esper and U.S. Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
The City of New York et al v. The United States Department of Defense et al
as 1:2017cv01464
Defendant:
Heather A. Wilson, The United States Department of Defense, The United States Department of the Navy and others
Plaintiff:
The City and County of San Francisco, The City of New York and The City of Philadelphia
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
