Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Pearson v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00809
Plaintiff:
Clinton James Pearson, Jr.
Defendant:
Patrice Richie Jones and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pearson v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00656
Plaintiff:
Clinton James Pearson, Jr.
Defendant:
Ellen Brooks, John Hartley, Steven T. Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PEARSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv54090
Plaintiff:
JAMES PEARSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEARSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv40674
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA JAMES PEARSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pearson v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00379
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Patrice Richie Jones, Steven T. Marshall and others
Plaintiff:
Clinton James Pearson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEARSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv08690
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES PEARSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pearson v. Hartley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00738
Plaintiff:
Clinton James Pearson, Jr.
Defendant:
John Hartley, Ellen Brooks, Steven T. Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Monroe County Jail et al
as 4:2015cv10214
Plaintiff:
James Pearson
Defendant:
Monroe County Jail and Plantation Key Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams Holding Corporation v. Vi-Tel Wireless, LLC et al
as 8:2015cv00180
Plaintiff:
Williams Holding Corporation
Defendant:
Vi-Tel Wireless, LLC, James Pearson, Larry A. Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pearson v. Hetzel, et al. (INMATE 3)
as 2:2014cv00100
Plaintiff:
Clinton James Pearson, Jr.
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
