Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Crow v. Nunez
as 5:2014cv00007
Plaintiff:
James Robert Crow
Defendant:
Ernesto Nunez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Yandell v. Cherokee County Governmental Building Authority et al
as 6:2013cv00251
Plaintiff:
Justin Lee Yandell
Defendant:
Cherokee County Governmental Building Authority, Loyd Bickel, James Robert Keener and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. London
as 13-6079
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DARRICK JERMAINE LONDON, AKA Darnell Wilson, AKA Derick Winston, AKA D-Loaded, AKA Marc Robinson, AKA Daryl Smith, AKA James Roberts, AKA James Robinson, AKA Darrell Johnson, AKA James Wilson, AKA Darrell Kinchen, AKA James Acklin
O'Neill v. California Farms, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00676
Plaintiff:
Barry O'Neill
Defendant:
California Farms, Inc., James Roberts and Dan Fantz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ruston v. United States, et al
as 11-3311
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESTER JON RUSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MICHAEL NALLEY, RICHARD SCHOTT and others
Frisk v. Safeco Insurance
as 1:2011cv02473
Plaintiff:
James Robert Frisk
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ruston v. United States of America et al
as 5:2011cv03003
Plaintiff:
Lester Jon Ruston
Defendant:
United States of America, Michael Nalley, Richard W. Schott and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Bonomelli v. Dinwiddie
as 10-6130
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ROBERT BONOMELLI
Respondent - Appellee:
WALTER DINWIDDIE, Warden
Cole, et al v. CSC Applied Technologies, LLC
as 09-6250
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN COLE and JAMES ROBERT ELLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CSC APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv00247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Americans with Disabilities
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
