Cases 1 - 10 of 21
ROBINSON v. BROTHERS et al
as 2:2023cv02021
Petitioner:
GARY JAMES ROBINSON
Respondent:
MARK BROTHERS, THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PARDONS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
ROBINSON v. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2021cv05059
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBINSON
Defendant:
GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Robinson v. Northumberland County Jail et al
as 3:2021cv01905
Plaintiff:
Michael James Robinson
Defendant:
Northumberland County Jail, Lt. Joe Shurock and Sgt. Bart Shuman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. KAUFFMAN et al
as 2:2019cv00878
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, PA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and KEVIN KAUFFMAN
Petitioner:
JAMES ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robinson v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2018cv00462
Plaintiff:
James Robinson
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Kevin Kauffman and Ms. Sipple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv01509
Petitioner:
JAMES ROBINSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ROBINSON v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv07339
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBINSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, COMMISSIONER OF PRISONS, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THE STATE OF ALABAMA v. LUTHA JAMES ROBINSON, JR
as 2:2013mc00147
Claimant:
LUTHA JAMES ROBINSON, JR
Defendant:
THE STATE OF ALABAMA
Cause Of Action: Motion for Order
ROBINSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2001cv41759
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBINSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
