Cases 21 - 30 of 95
RONQUEST v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2016cv01634
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROGER RONQUEST
Defendant:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, DAVID LEACH, ANTHONY FOXX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carol Saltzman v. James Rogers, Warden
as 16-30839
Petitioner - Appellant:
CAROL SALTZMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES ROGERS, WARDEN, LOUISIANA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN
Ronquest v. Newton et al
as 5:2016ct03179
Plaintiff:
James Roger Ronquest
Defendant:
S. Newton, S. Moss, David C. Leach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheila Hamilton v. James Rogers, Warden
as 16-30494
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHEILA HAMILTON
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES ROGERS, WARDEN, LOUISIANA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN
Martin v. Rogers et al
as 2:2016cv03297
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Lee Marie Martin
Defendant:
James Rogers
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Passaniti v. Rogers
as 5:2016cv00281
Plaintiff:
Linda Kate Keeney Passaniti
Defendant:
James Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Onnie Mack v. James Rogers, Warden
as 16-30119
Petitioner - Appellant:
ONNIE MACK
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES ROGERS, WARDEN, LOUISIANA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN
Crawford v. Rogers et al
as 2:2015cv06961
Plaintiff:
Carole L. Crawford
Defendant:
James Rogers
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RONQUEST v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2015cv02199
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROGER RONQUEST
Defendant:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, DAVID LEACH and ANTHONY B. FOX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tiffany Woods v. James Rogers, Warden
as 15-31057
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIFFANY M. WOODS
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES ROGERS, WARDEN, LOUISIANA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
