Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Delgado v. Snell et al
as 3:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
CODY DELGADO
Defendant:
James Snell and City of Clyde
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Snell v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv19696
Plaintiff:
James Snell
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
James Snell v. United Specialty Insurance Company
as 22-12581
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES SNELL
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Brown v. Federated Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 2:2021cv02102
Plaintiff:
Donald Brown
Defendant:
Federated Mutual Insurance Company, Dees Oil Company, Inc., James Snell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Snell v. United Specialty Insurance Company
as 1:2021cv00229
Plaintiff:
James Snell doing business as Outdoor Expressions
Defendant:
United Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
SNELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv02342
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES SNELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SNELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv01967
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES SNELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SNELLING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv79016
Plaintiff:
JAMES SNELLING
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00802
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019at00428
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
