Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Perez v. Kilowitzenew et al
as 2:2012cv02144
Plaintiff:
Donato Perez
Defendant:
Chad Kilowitzenew, Ramonovich and James Stevenson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevenson v. N.Y.S Dept. of Correction
as 10-3071
Petitioner - Appellant:
James Stevenson
Respondent - Appellee:
N.Y.S Dept. of Corrections
Stevenson v. Wilkinson et al
as 1:2010cv00520
Plaintiff:
James Stevenson
Defendant:
Tim Wilkinson, Virgil Lucas, Tommy Glover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevenson v. Corrections Corp of America of Tennessee L L C et al
as 1:2009cv02234
Plaintiff:
James Stevenson
Defendant:
Insurance Co of Corrections Corp of America of Tennessee L L C, Alfonzo Pacheco, Patricia Griffin Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curtis Smith v. Timothy Bukowski, et al
as 09-3660
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY BUKOWSKI, MICHAEL D. DOWNEY, JAMES STEVENSON and others
Horrell v. Downey et al
as 2:2009cv02110
Plaintiff:
Phillip L Horrell
Defendant:
Mike Downey, Carl Brown, Timothy Menard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Aston v. Jay Aston et al
as 8:2008cv00181
Plaintiff:
Michael Aston
Defendant:
Jay Aston, James Stevenson, Peter Rizzo and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Smith v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2007cv02216
Plaintiff:
Curtis Smith
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, United States Marshal Service, Timothy F Bukowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. United States Department Of Justice et al
as 1:2007cv05792
Plaintiff:
Curtis Smith
Defendant:
United States Department Of Justice, United States Marshal Service, Timothy F Bukowski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
