Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Nolan Floyd, Sr. v. Shane Weber
as 23-7143
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOLAN KINARD FLOYD, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN SHANE WEBER, CHIEF OF SECURITY KEITH ARNOLD, LT. JAMES SMITH and others
Marshall v. Tichnell et al
as 1:2016cv01491
Plaintiff:
Gregory Marshall
Defendant:
James Tichnell, Richard J. Graham, Jr. and Stephen T. Moyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dontay Carter-El v. Scott S. Oakley
as 16-6093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONTAY CARTER-EL
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. BRAD WILT, SCOTT S. OAKLEY, ROBIN WOOLFORD and others
Wayne Williams v. Frank Bishop
as 15-6833
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE V. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK B. BISHOP, OFFICER RANDALL, COII, SERGEANT MERLING and others
Defendant:
JANICE GILMORE
Michael Chew v. Kathleen Green
as 14-7437
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL CHEW
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN GREEN, Warden and JAMES TICHNELL
Defendant:
GREGORY BIRCH, PAUL WISENGOFF, DENISE GELSINGER and others
Party-in-Interest:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Carter-El v. Oakley et al
as 1:2014cv02545
Plaintiff:
Dontay Carter-El
Defendant:
Scott S. Oakley, Robin Woolford, Lenora Adegbesan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chew v. Green et al
as 8:2013cv02115
Plaintiff:
Michael Chew
Defendant:
Kathleen Green , Paul Wisengoff, Gregory Birch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCauley v. Bishop et al
as 8:2013cv00732
Plaintiff:
John McCauley
Defendant:
Frank B. Bishop, Jr., Michael Thomas, Rodney Likin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pitts v. Bishop et al
as 8:2013cv00530
Plaintiff:
Marshall W. Pitts, Jr.
Defendant:
Frank Bishop, Michael P. Thomas and James Tichnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edward Jefferson v. Frank Bishop
as 12-8163
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD W. JEFFERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN FRANK BISHOP, M. NORTHCRAFT, JAMES TICHNELL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
