Cases 1 - 10 of 52
J&G Sales, Inc. v. Pontchartrain Partners, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv03254
Plaintiff:
J&G Sales, Inc.
Defendant:
Pontchartrain Partners, LLC, Danny Blanks, Barlow Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Washington v. Canopius US Insurance, Inc
as 2:2022cv03456
Plaintiff:
James Washington, Jr. and James Washington, Jr
Defendant:
Canopius US Insurance, Inc
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
USA v. Jeremy Washington
as 17-30434
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JEREMY JAMES WASHINGTON, also known as Worm
Timothy Washington v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-10231
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIMOTHY JAMES WASHINGTON
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Washington v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00719
Plaintiff:
James Washington
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2015cv02046
Petitioner:
Timothy James Washington
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Washington v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2013cv03624
Petitioner:
Michael James Washington
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
James Washington, Jr. v. Erica Surpreant
as 12-10401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES WASHINGTON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ERICA SURPREANT, Research Associate
James Washington, Jr. v. Erica Suorpreant, et al
as 12-10061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES WASHINGTON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ERICA SUORPREANT, Texas Department of Criminal Justice Employee and CUSSMAN JOHNSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
