Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Erskine et al v. Mears et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00381
Plaintiff: Justin Erskine, Lateef Dickerson, Matthew Hoskins and others
Defendant: Truman Mears, Joseph Beck, Marvella Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv15471
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
WEST et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv10873
Plaintiff: JAMES WEST and NANCY WEST
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON COMSUMER COMPANIES, INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. WEST et al
as 2:2017cv04270
Plaintiff: JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant: CHUNG WEST and JAMES WEST
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
Glenn et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv05071
Plaintiff: Karen Glenn , JAMES WEST and Tracy Mathis
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-3237
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
BABICKI v. FORSTER AND GARBUS et al
as 2:2010cv02610
Plaintiff: SEAN BABICKI
Defendant: FORSTER AND GARBUS, JAMES WEST, MARK LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01360
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
WEST v. E.D. BULLARD et al
as 2:2008cv60735
Plaintiff: JAMES WEST, SR., JAMES WEST, SR., JAMES WEST, SR. and others
Defendant: E.D. BULLARD, ATLAS TURNER, INC., ATLAS TURNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?