Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Burchard v. Racine Correctional Institution
as 1:2020cv00231
Plaintiff:
James William Burchard
Defendant:
Racine Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillon v. Reilly et al
as 3:2019cv01265
Defendant:
Tom Llewellyn, Michael A. Reilly, James Gaddy and others
Plaintiff:
Oscar Dillon, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILLIAMS v. LAYTON et al
as 1:2018cv04079
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE, MARION COUNTY JAIL and JOHN LAYTON
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams
as 3:2018cv03128
Petitioner:
James Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
Kevin Kink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. CBS News Network et al
as 1:2017cv09021
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
CBS News Network
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv05076
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc., A. Martija, Saleh Obaisi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FROST v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2015cv00286
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILLIAMS FROST, JR.
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and DUSHAN ZATECKY
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. BROWN
as 2:2014cv00164
Respondent:
DICK BROWN
Petitioner:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE et al
as 3:2013cv00100
Defendant:
CITY OF EVANSVILLE, COUNTY OF VANDERBURGH, NICHOLAS HERMAN and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIE G. MAFFETT v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE et al
as 3:2013cv00023
Plaintiff:
KYLE ANDERSON, LARRY A ANDERSON, JEREMY BIRDWELD and others
Defendant:
CITY OF EVANSVILLE, COUNTY OF VANDERBURGH, NICHOLAS HERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
