Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Hall v. O'Brien et al
as 5:2022cv00580
Plaintiff:
James William Hall
Defendant:
Judge Tammy O'Brien, Magistrate Judge Tamara J. Todd, James R. Silver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dailey v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01205
Plaintiff:
James William Dailey
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hall v. G.M.S. Management Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01564
Plaintiff:
James William Hall
Defendant:
G.M.S. Management Co., Inc., James R. Ogden, Barberton Municipal Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barker, et al v. Lars Group Trust
as 1:2020cv02641
Plaintiff:
Tara R. Barker and Shawn H. Holloway
Defendant:
Lars Group Trust and Harry James Williams
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Ruby et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00810
Plaintiff:
BRENDA RUBY and JAMES WILLIAM RUBY
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Syphan et al
as 3:2020cv00591
Defendant:
Pitt Ohio Express, LLC and Edward Syphan
Plaintiff:
James Williams, V, J. W. and Jacquelynn Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. CR Bard et al
as 2:2019cv03508
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C R BARD
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deloney v. Cooper et al
as 1:2018cv00415
Plaintiff:
James William Deloney
Defendant:
Ethna M. Cooper and Joseph T Deters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Advance Wire Forming, Inc. et al v. Stein
as 1:2018cv00723
Plaintiff:
Advance Wire Forming, Inc. , Advance Industries Group, LLC , AIG Holdlings, LLC and others
Defendant:
Jeffrey Stein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00987
Plaintiff:
James William Young
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
