General Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Williams v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv03354
Petitioner: Michael James Williams
Respondent: State of Georgia and Warden Walter Berry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2020cv00125
Petitioner: James Williams
Respondent: STATE OF GEORGIA and TERENCE KILPATRICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. State of Georgia
as 1:2019cv03222
Petitioner: James Williams
Respondent: State of Georgia and Terence Kilpatrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shedd v. Walker County Courthouse We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv01041
Respondent: Walker County Courthouse
Petitioner: James Williams Shedd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Bailey, IV v. Warden, et al
as 14-15154
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMES WILLIAM BAILEY, IV
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
HUGHES v. BOWEN
as 5:2013cv00071
Petitioner: JAMES WILLIAM HUGHES
Respondent: TOMMY BOWEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Patterson et al (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00007
Plaintiff: James William Bailey, IV
Defendant: Tony Patterson and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Watkins v. Warden, Donaldson CF, et al
as 11-12377
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMES WILLIAMS WATKINS
Respondent - Appellee: GARY HETZEL, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Bailey v. Patterson, et al (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00321
Plaintiff: James William Bailey, IV
Defendant: Tony Patterson and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Allen
as 1:2011cv00637
Plaintiff: Wallace James Williams
Defendant: Marty Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?