Cases 1 - 10 of 13
FROST v. KNIZER et al
as 1:2021cv03046
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILLIAM FROST, JR.
Defendant:
KNIZER, WESTFORD MEDICAL and PENDLETON CORR FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHEAD v. WARDEN
as 1:2020cv01056
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILLIAM SHEAD, JR
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. LAYTON et al
as 1:2018cv04079
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE, MARION COUNTY JAIL and JOHN LAYTON
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FROST v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2015cv00286
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILLIAMS FROST, JR.
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and DUSHAN ZATECKY
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. BROWN
as 2:2014cv00164
Respondent:
DICK BROWN
Petitioner:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE et al
as 3:2013cv00100
Defendant:
CITY OF EVANSVILLE, COUNTY OF VANDERBURGH, NICHOLAS HERMAN and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIE G. MAFFETT v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE et al
as 3:2013cv00023
Plaintiff:
KYLE ANDERSON, LARRY A ANDERSON, JEREMY BIRDWELD and others
Defendant:
CITY OF EVANSVILLE, COUNTY OF VANDERBURGH, NICHOLAS HERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY'S SUPERINTENDENT
as 2:2009cv00063
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Respondent:
PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY'S SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WILLIAMS v. BUSS et al
as 2:2009cv00059
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Defendant:
EDDIE G. BUSS, BRUCE LEMMON, ALISIA LAWRENCE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WILLIAMS v. PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2008cv00486
Petitioner:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Respondent:
PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
