Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Adelso Jamie-Sanchez v. William Barr
as 19-70826
Petitioner:
ADELSO ENRIQUE JAMIE-SANCHEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Sanchez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2017cv00226
Plaintiff:
Jamie Sanchez, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United States v. $112,061.00 in US Currency
as 16-1388
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$112,061.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Claimant - Appellant:
JAMIE SANCHEZ
Francisco Vega v. Mario Sanchez et al
as 2:2016cv06017
Defendant:
Does, Jamie Sanchez and Mario Sanchez
Plaintiff:
Francisco Vega
United States v. 112,061.00
as 15-1199
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
112,061.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Claimant - Appellant:
JAMIE SANCHEZ
Marque D Fricks v. J Soto et al
as 2:2015cv02017
Plaintiff:
Marque D Fricks
Defendant:
Aaron Licon, Albert Peterson, Albert Peterson and others
USA v. $112,061.00 in United States Currency
as 1:2014cv02823
Defendant:
$112,061.00 in United States Currency
Plaintiff:
USA
Claimant:
Jamie Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Democratic Republic of the Co v. Air Capital Group, LLC, et al
as 14-11243
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO
Defendant - Appellant:
AIR CAPITAL GROUP, LLC, MARIO ABAD, individually and JAMIE SANCHEZ, individually
:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv06825
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Air Capital Group, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv20607
Plaintiff:
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Defendant:
Air Capital Group, LLC, Mario Abad, Jamie Sanchez and others
Cross_claimant:
Commercial Jet Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Air Capital Group, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Commercial Jet Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
