Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Jamiel Johnson v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-2250
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMIEL JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT FAYETTE SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and others
Jamiel JohnsonIn re: Jamiel Johnson
as 22-1572
Petitioner:
In re: JAMIEL JOHNSON
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00017
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Jamiel Johnson v. Wetzel, et al
as 21-1972
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMIEL JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of the PA Dept. of Corrections and DEBRA JADLOCKI, Inmate Accountant II at SCI Smithfield
JOHNSON v. CLARKE
as 1:2021cv00121
Plaintiff:
JAMIEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER B.B. CLARKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jamiel Johnson v. John Wetzel, et al
as 20-1991
Defendant / Appellee:
DORINA VARNER, LISA HOLLIBAUGH, DEBRA JADLOCKI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMIEL JOHNSON
Jamiel Johnson v. Secretary Pennsylvania, et al
as 19-3683
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMIEL JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FAYETTE SCI, SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and others
In re: Jamiel Johnson
as 19-1727
Not Yet Classified:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT FAYETTE SCI and others
Jamiel Johnson v. Secretary Pennsylvania Depart, et al
as 19-1468
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMIEL JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FAYETTE SCI, SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Johnson v. Wolf et al
as 3:2018cv01785
Defendant:
Thomas McGinley, John E. Wetzel and Tom Wolf
Plaintiff:
Jamiel Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
