Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Goodman v. Prison Health Services Inc et al
as 1:2010cv00172
Plaintiff:
Mary Frances Goodman
Defendant:
Prison Health Services Inc , Peggy Chester , Jamil Saba and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaillard v. Dougherty County Georgia et al
as 1:2009cv00122
Plaintiff:
Charles Gaillard
Defendant:
Dougherty County Georgia, Jamil Saba and James Miller, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clyde v. Georgia, Dougherty County et al
as 1:2008cv00130
Plaintiff:
Adrian Clyde
Defendant:
Georgia, Dougherty County, Jamil Saba and Donnell Jordan
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thomas v. Saba et al
as 1:2008cv00093
Plaintiff:
Otis Patrick Thomas, Sr.
Defendant:
Jamil Saba, Leisa G Terry and Kenneth Ellis
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ross v. Saba et al
as 1:2008cv00081
Plaintiff:
Claretha Ross
Defendant:
Jamil Saba, Ken Faust, Ventura Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Lee County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2008cv00024
Plaintiff:
Travis Smith
Defendant:
Lee County Sheriff's Department, Harold Breeden, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith et al v. Saba et al
as 1:2007cv00124
Plaintiff:
Travis Smith
Defendant:
Jamil Saba, Cpl. Leblanc, Dougherty County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Saba et al
as 1:2007cv00074
Plaintiff:
Calvin Phillips
Defendant:
Jamil Saba, Trinity Food Ind. Services, Haggerty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Saba
as 1:2007cv00081
Petitioner:
Alonzo Johnson, Jr.
Respondent:
Jamil Saba
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Homes, et al
as 1:2007cv00011
Plaintiff:
Calvin Phillips
Defendant:
Ms. Holmes, Ms. Holmes and Jamil Saba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
