Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Hobbs v. Stevens, et al
as 2:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Houston Hobbs
Defendant:
Angela K Stevens, John/Jane Doe 2, John/Jane Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
The Heidi Group, Inc. v. Texas Health and Human Services Commission et al
as 1:2022cv00294
Plaintiff:
The Heidi Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Cecile Erwin Young, Office of the Inspector General of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Reger v. Keller et al
as 1:2019cv00395
Defendant:
Attorney General Warren Kenneth Paxton, Jr., Presiding Judge Dean Rucker, Landon A. Wade and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Jay Reger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robbins v. Does 1-10
as 1:2018mc00647
Defendant:
Baylor University
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 10, Jane Doe 2 and others
Respondent:
Jane Does 1-10
Movant:
William K. Robbins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Robbins v. Does 1-10
as 6:2018mc00219
Defendant:
Baylor University
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 10, Jane Doe 2 and others
Respondent:
Jane Does 1-10
Movant:
William K. Robbins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv00173
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Special Master:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health Services, Inc. et al v. Traylor et al
as 1:2015cv01058
Defendant:
Stuart W. Bowen, Jr. and Chris Traylor
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 10, Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
